In spherical trigonometry, the law of cosines (or, more specifically, the law of cosines for sides) is a theorem relating the three sides and one of the angles of a spherical triangle, analogous to the planar law of cosines for a triangle in the Euclidean plane.
A spherical triangle is a shape on a sphere consisting of three vertices (corner points) connected by three sides, each of which is part of a great circle, the analog on the sphere of a straight line in the plane (for example the equator and meridians of a globe). The arc lengths of the sides are proportional to the measures of the central angles they subtend. The angles between sides are dihedral angles between the planes containing them. In the image, , , and represent three points on the sphere. If the angular lengths of the sides are (from to (from to ), and (from to ), and the angle of the corner opposite is , then the (first) spherical law of cosines states:Romuald Ireneus 'Scibor-Marchocki, Spherical trigonometry, Elementary-Geometry Trigonometry web page (1997).
As a special case, when then , resulting in the spherical analogue of the Pythagorean theorem:
If the law of cosines is used to solve for , the necessity of inverting the cosine magnifies rounding errors when is small. In this case, the alternative formulation of the law of haversines is preferable.R. W. Sinnott, "Virtues of the Haversine", Sky and Telescope 68 (2), 159 (1984).
A second spherical law of cosines, sometimes called the law of cosines for angles, relates the three angles and one of the sides of a triangle:
where and are the angles of the corners opposite to sides and , respectively. It is related to the first law by polar duality.
Proofs First proof Let , and denote the unit vectors from the center of a unit sphere to those corners of the triangle. The angles and distances do not change if the coordinate system is rotated, so we can rotate the coordinate system so that is at the north pole and is somewhere on the prime meridian (longitude of 0). With this rotation, the spherical coordinates for are where is the angle measured from the north pole not from the equator, and the spherical coordinates for are The Cartesian coordinates for are and the Cartesian coordinates for are The value of is the dot product of the two Cartesian vectors, which is
Second proof Let , and denote the unit vectors from the center of the sphere to those corners of the triangle. We have , , , and . The vectors and have lengths and respectively and the angle between them is , so
using cross products, dot products, and the Binet–Cauchy identity
Third proof There is a proof using quaternions. Let , , and denote the unit vectors from the center of the unit sphere to those corners of the triangle. We define the quaternion . The quaternion is used to represent a rotation by 180° around the axis indicated by the vector . We note that using as the axis of rotation gives the same result, and that the rotation is its own inverse. We also define and .
We compute the product of quaternions, which also gives the composition of the corresponding rotations:
where represents the real (scalar) and imaginary (vector) parts of a quaternion, is the angle between and , and is the axis of the rotation that moves to along a great circle. Similarly we define:
The quaternions , , and are used to represent rotations with axes of rotation , , and , respectively, and angles of rotation , , and , respectively. (Because these are double angles, each of , , and represents two applications of the rotation implied by an edge of the spherical triangle.)
From the definitions, it follows that
which tells us that the composition of these rotations is the identity transformation. In particular, gives us
Expanding the left-hand side, we obtain
Equating the real parts on both sides of the identity, we obtain
Because is parallel to , is parallel to , and is the angle between and , it follows that . Thus,
Rearrangements The first and second spherical laws of cosines can be rearranged to put the sides () and angles () on opposite sides of the equations:
Planar limit: small angles For small spherical triangles, i.e. for small , and , the spherical law of cosines is approximately the same as the ordinary planar law of cosines,
To prove this, we will use the small-angle approximation obtained from the Maclaurin series for the cosine and sine functions:
Substituting these expressions into the spherical law of cosines nets:
or after simplifying:
The big O terms for and are dominated by as and get small, so we can write this last expression as:
History Various trigonometric equations equivalent to the spherical law of cosines were used in the course of solving astronomical problems by medieval Islamic astronomers al-Khwārizmī (9th century) and al-Battānī (c. 900), Indian astronomer Nīlakaṇṭha (15th century), and Austrian astronomer Georg von Peuerbach (15th century) but none of them treated it as a general method for solving spherical triangles. For example, al-Khwārizmī calculated the azimuth of the Sun in terms of its altitude , terrestrial latitude , and ortive amplitude (angular distance between due East and the Sun's rising place on the horizon) as . (See Horizontal coordinate system.)
The spherical law of cosines appeared as an independent trigonometrical identity for solving spherical triangles in Peuerbach's student Regiomontanus's (unfinished at Regiomontanus's death in 1476, published posthumously 1533), a foundational work for European trigonometry and astronomy which comprehensively described how to solve plane and spherical triangles. Regiomontanus used nearly the modern form, but written in terms of the versine, , rather than the cosine,
Mathematical historians have speculated that Regiomontanus may have adapted the result from specific astronomical examples in al-Battānī's , which was published in Latin translation annotated by Regiomontanus in 1537.
See also Half-side formula Hyperbolic law of cosines Solution of triangles Spherical law of sines
Notes
References
he:טריגונומטריה ספירית#משפט הקוסינוסים