The Endothiodon Assemblage Zone is a tetrapod assemblage zone (also called a biozone) in the Adelaide Subgroup of the Beaufort Group, a fossiliferous and geologically important geological group of the Karoo Supergroup in South Africa. Outcrops of the lower Teekloof Formation and much of the Middleton Formation represent this assemblage zone, and other formations throughout Africa have also been correlated to it. The Endothiodon Assemblage Zone (EAZ) is the third oldest biozone of the Beaufort Group, dated to around in the middle to late Permian period. It follows the older Tapinocephalus and Eodicynodon assemblage zones, and is named for the relative abundance and distinctiveness of the herbivorous dicynodont therapsid Endothiodon in this unit.
The Endothiodon Assemblage Zone is further divided into the stratigraphically lower (older) Subzone and higher (younger) Subzone. The thickest outcrops are located along the Nuweveld region of the Great Escarpment, and preserve the depositional environments of rivers and lakes. The EAZ overlaps with the Capitanian mass extinction event and, as such, preserves a record of ecosystem recovery immediately after this event. Many animals are represented by the EAZ, including diverse dicynodonts, gorgonopsians, therocephalians, biarmosuchians, cynodontians, early reptiles, and temnospondyls.
Like other assemblage zones in the Beaufort Group, the Endothiodon AZ has a convoluted history, having been referred to under several different names and definitions; from 1906 to 1970, the biozone was deemed either the "Endothiodon Beds" or "Endothiodon Zone". It was then lumped into the younger Cistecephalus Zone in 1970, before being split into two separate zones—the lower Pristerognathus AZ and upper Tropidostoma AZ—in 1978. In 2020, a revision of the Beaufort Group recombined these assemblage zones into a newly redefined Endothiodon AZ.
History
In 1889, British palaeontologist Harry Seeley travelled to South Africa to conduct fieldwork in the Karoo Supergroup. He recognized that, as one traveled up the Nuweveld Escarpment, the outcrops demonstrated noticeably distinct zones; after discussing the pareiasaur fossils in the lower levels in a lecture delivered that year, he noted:
This faunal transition Seeley observed is now recognized as one of the most distinct biotic changes in the succession of the Beaufort Group, marking the end of what is now the Tapinocephalus Assemblage Zone (Guadalupian fauna) and the younger and stratigraphically higher Lopingian faunas. In an 1892 discussion on the geological horizons (levels of rock outcrops) is South Africa, Seeley recognized the division of these layers into biozones based on their vertebrate content, and referred to these higher assemblages as the "zone of Dicynodonts" in a scheme comprising five distinct zones, three of which are part of the Beaufort Group.
After Scottish-born palaeontologist Robert Broom observed some of the South African fossils Seeley brought to England, he recognized their biological significance and sailed to South Africa to begin collecting and studying fossils in the Karoo region. In 1906, he proposed an updated, more precise biostratigraphic division scheme for the Beaufort Group. Herein, Broom split Seeley's "zone of Dicynodonts" into a lower and upper section, regarded as the "Endothiodon" and "Kistecephalus" beds, respectively.
Broom subsequently tabulated the relative abundance of fossil taxa in his proposed biozones in a 1909 occurrence list. Two years later, English zoologist D. M. S. Watson visited the South African outcrops. In 1914, he claimed that no pariasaurian or dinocephalian remains had been found in the Endothiodon Beds, but that abundant therocephalians and gorgonopsids were present in addition to large 'endothiodon' and very small 'dicynodon' specimens. This conflicted with Broom's list, which noted the presence of large 'dicynodons' and the pareiasaur "Propappus" (now regarded as a synonym of Pareiasaurus). Watson characterized the Endothiodon based on the presence of this genus in addition to "other large Endothiodonts and peculiar Gorgonopsids, and by the total absence of large Dicynodons".
Subsequent research by English-South African palaeontologist Sidney H. Haughton reiterated the presence of "Propappus" in these layers. Haughton further noted that, in relation to the preceding Tapinocephalus Zone (renamed from Pareiasaurus Zone due to the absence of this genus in those layers), the Endothiodon Zone has a striking absence of large-bodied animals.
In 1970, South African paleontologist James W. Kitching proposed the absorption of the Endothiodon Zone into the lower part of the younger Cistecephalus Zone. This was due to concerns that the two were lithologically (i.e., the physical structure of the rock outcrops) indistinguishable, as well the fact that Endothiodon was especially common around the Beaufort West locality, but not in localities northward, where it co-occurred with Cistecephalus. However, the fossils Kitching collected were almost all from the upper part of the range of Endothiodon, while its lower range has less widely exposed outcrops. Eight years later, André W. Keyser and Roger M. H. Smith proposed an updated biozonation scheme for the Beaufort Group. This included the recognition of two novel biozones between the Tapinocephalus and Cistecephalus zones, in the place of the traditional Endothiodon Zone: the lower Pristerognathus/Diictodon Assemblage Zone and the upper Tropidostoma microtrema (or Tropidostoma-Endothiodon AZ, per the now-abandoned two-name scheme) assemblage zone. In a 1995 volume discussing each Beaufort Group assemblage zone separately, published in association with the South African Committee for Stratigraphy (S.A.C.S.), these two zones were formally recognized as the Pristerognathus and Tropidostoma assemblage zones. After 1995, these two assemblage zones were implemented widely in place of the historic "Endothiodon Zone".
In 2020, Michael O. Day and Roger M. H. Smith reassessed the Pristerognathus AZ and Tropidostoma AZ as part of a significantly updated and extended version of the 1995 Beaufort Group volume. They recognized shortcomings in the previous classification scheme, including the presence of the index fossil Oudenodon and Cistecephalus together in the range of Tropidostoma. Based on more recent collecting, the abundance of Endothiodon was better understood; this genus appears, reaching its highest abundance, before any recorded instances of Tropidostoma. Furthermore, the vertebrate fauna of the upper part of the "Pristerognathus AZ" is more similar to the "Tropidostoma AZ" than it is to its own lower part. Using a combination of these new fossil discoveries, an updated understanding of the regional stratigraphy, and novel taxonomic interpretations, Day & Smith combined these two zones into a redefined Endothiodon Assemblage Zone, excluding the lower third of the Pristerognathus AZ, which was grouped with the more similar Tapinocephalus AZ. This name has been adopted by researchers in the scientific literature since then.
+Historical summary of Beaufort Group biostratigraphic schemesSeeley, 1892Broom, 1906Haughton, 1919Kitching, 1970Keyser & Smith, 1978/1980Rubidge, 1990S.A.C.S., 1995Smith et al., 2020⇑
Beaufort Group
⇓zone of "highly specialized" TheriodontsCynognathus BedsCynognathus ZoneCynognathus ZoneKannemeyeria-Diademodon AZKannemeyeria-Diademodon AZCynognathus AZCynognathus Assemblage Zone—Lystrosaurus bedsLystrosaurus ZoneLystrosaurus ZoneLystrosaurus-Thrinaxodon AZLystrosaurus-Thrinaxodon AZLystrosaurus AZLystrosaurus declivis Assemblage Zone—Procolophon BedsProcolophon Zone———Daptocephalus ZoneDicynodon lacerticeps-Whaitsia AZDicynodon lacerticeps-Whaitsia AZDicynodon AZDaptocephalus Assemblage Zonezone of DicynodontsKistecephalus BedsCistecephalus ZoneCistecephalus Range ZoneAulacephalodon-Cistecephalus AZAulacephalodon-Cistecephalus AZCistecephalus AZCistecephalus Assemblage ZoneEndothiodon BedsEndothiodon ZoneTropidostoma-Endothiodon AZTropidostoma-Endothiodon AZTropidostoma AZEndothiodon Assemblage ZonePristerognathus-Diictodon AZPristerognathus-Diictodon AZPristerognathus AZzone of PareiasauriansPareiasaurus BedsTapinocephalus ZoneTapinocephalus ZoneDinocephalia / Tapinocephalus-Bradysaurus Assemblage Zone (AZ)Dinocephalia (Tapinocephalus) AZTapinocephalus AZTapinocephalus Assemblage Zone—————Eodicynodon-Tapinocaninus AZEodicynodon AZEodicynodon Assemblage Zone
Lithology and description
The Endothiodon Assemblage Zone comprises two distinct subzones characterized by differences in faunal composition and lithology. The Subzone is stratigraphically lower (older in age), and is roughly equivalent to the upper two-thirds of the former "Pristerognathus Assemblage Zone". The lower third of the Pristerognathus AZ was transferred to the uppermost Tapinocephalus AZ. Meanwhile, the Subzone is stratigraphically higher (younger in age), and is directly equivalent to the former "Tropidostoma Assemblage Zone". Overall, the Endothiodon AZ generally corresponds with the lower Teekloof Formation (most of the Poortjie and Hoedemaker members) and much of the Middleton Formation, two units of the Adelaide Subgroup of the Beaufort Group. The base of the lower subzone (and the AZ as a whole) is dated to , while the top of the upper subzone (and the AZ as a whole) is dated to . As such, it spans from the latest Capitanian age to the mid-Wuchiapingian age, crossing the boundary between the Guadalupian and Lopingian epochs near the end of the Permian period.
Various geological formations and basins in Africa have been correlated to the EAZ. Among these are the upper Madumabisa Mudstone Formation in Zambia's Luangwa Basin and Zimbabwe's mid-Zambezi Basin, Malawi's Chiweta Beds, Mozambique's Lunho Series, Namibia's lower Omingonde Formation, and the upper Ruhuhu and lower Usili formations in Tanzania's Ruhuhu Basin.
Lycosuchus - Eunotosaurus Subzone
This subzone is named and defined based on the co-occurrence of the namesake Endothiodon with the distinctive taxa Lycosuchus (a therocephalian) and Eunotosaurus (an early reptile). Both of these genera are also found in the lower Tapinocephalus AZ, but they do not exist with Endothiodon here. In the southwest region of the Karoo Basin, the Lycosuchus - Eunotosaurus Subzone correlates with the upper two-thirds of the Poortjie Member of the Teekloof Formation, and its upper boundary (that contacts the Tropidostoma - Gorgonops Subzone) lines up with the base of the overlying Hoedemaker Member of this formation. In the southeast part of the Karoo Basin, this subzone correlates with the lower part of the Middleton Formation. Parts of the subzone also correlate with the Abrahamskraal Formation, which lies below the Teekloof and Middleton formations.
The base of this subzone is defined based on the first occurrence of the genus Endothiodon, matching the definition for the onset of the assemblage zone as a whole. The age of the base is well-constrained based on radiometric dates from the Poortjie Member, at . The upper boundary is defined based on the first occurrence of Tropidostoma (which defines the upper subzone). Its age is less well-constrained, but is most likely between (latest Capitanian to earliest Wuchiapingian).