This article summarizes the genetic makeup and population history of East Asian peoples and their connection to genetically related populations such as other Eastern Asians (Southeast Asians, North Asians), Indigenous Americans, Oceanians, Pacific Islanders and partly Central Asians and South Asians. They are collectively referred to as "East Eurasians" in population genomics.
Overview Origins
Population genomic research has studied the origin and formation of modern East Asians. The ancestors of East Asians (Ancient East Eurasians) split from Ancient West Eurasians possibly as early as 50,000 to 80,000 years ago. Possible routes into East Asia include a northern route from Central Asia, beginning north of the Himalayas, and a southern route, beginning south of the Himalayas and moving through South and Southeast Asia. Vallini et al. 2024 noted that the divergence between Ancient East Eurasians and West Eurasians most likely occurred on the Persian Plateau between 46,000 to 57,000 years ago. Gandini et al. 2025 proposed a "long chronology", which suggested an earlier settlement of Sahul by East Eurasians about 60,000 years ago. Their descendants are indigenous to Australia, New Guinea, and Oceania and are related to other East Eurasians instead of belonging to a separate wave.
Phylogenetic data suggests that an early Initial Upper Paleolithic wave (at least 45,000 years ago) "ascribed to a population movement with uniform genetic features and material culture" (Ancient East Eurasians) dispersed throughout Eurasia, with one of its main branches (dubbed as East Eurasian Core; EEC) using a dispersal route along the southern coastline of Asia, where they subsequently diverged rapidly into the ancestors of Australasians (Oceanians), the Ancient Ancestral South Indians (AASI), as well as Andamanese and East/Southeast Asians (ESEA), although Papuans may have also received some geneflow from an earlier group (xOoA),Genetics and material culture support repeated expansions into Paleolithic Eurasia from a population hub out of Africa, Vallini et al. 2022 (4 April 2022) Quote: "Taken together with a lower bound of the final settlement of Sahul at 37 ka (the date of the deepest population splits estimated by Malaspinas et al. 2016), it is reasonable to describe Papuans as either an almost even mixture between East Asians and a lineage basal to West and East Asians occurred sometimes between 45 and 38 ka, or as a sister lineage of East Asians with or without a minor basal OoA or xOoA contribution. We here chose to parsimoniously describe Papuans as a simple sister group of Tianyuan, cautioning that this may be just one out of six equifinal possibilities." around 2%, next to additional archaic admixture in the Sahul region. Deeply diverged Ancient East Eurasian lineages associated with the spread of IUP-affiliated material culture along an early northern route into eastern Europe (Bacho Kiro Cave and Peștera cu Oase), Central Asia (Ust'-Ishim man), and Siberia (Kara-Bom, etc.), as well as Northwest China, did contribute only little or no ancestry to modern East Asians, which instead were found to descend primarily from the southern route wave.
The single southern route dispersal into the South-Southeast Asia region gave rise to the AASI, Andamanese, Eastern Asian and Australasian populations. The southern route origin is strongly supported by archaeogenetic data and genetic affinities between these "East Eurasian Core" (EEC) populations. Although the morphological more distinct traits of modern Northeast Asian and Siberian populations raised the question of a possible distinct northern origin, those traits have subsequently been associated with adaptions to the extremely cold climate during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) of 24–16 kya by an ancient people with initially southern affinities, which moved into Northeast Asia and Siberia from Southeast Asia. This is further supported by higher morphological affinities of ancient East Asian specimens, such as the Tianyuan man, the Zhoukoudian Upper Cave remains, the Liujiang man, the Red Deer Cave people, the Jōmon people as well as the Liangdao and Qihe Cave remains to "southern" populations and ancient remains, such as the Niah cave and Wajak remains or Hoabinhians, as well as modern Andamanese, Vedda, and Aboriginal Australians, but being genetically closer or basal to the derived Northeast Asian and Siberian groups.
Additionally, genetic diversity within present-day Asian populations, follows a strong correlation with latitude: genetic diversity is decreasing from south to north. The correlation continues to hold true when only mainland Southeast Asian and East Asian populations are considered. This may be attributable to a serial founder effect, and is consistent with a single eastward migration of modern humans along a southern route into South and Southeast Asia. Subsequently, ancestral East Asians diversified in southern East Asia and subsequently dispersed northward across the continent. The dominant paternal haplogroups of East Asians associated with the "southern route" belong to subclades of C-M217, D-M174, O-M175, and N-M231, among some others.
The exact patterns of the northwards dispersal of ancestral East Asians from Southeast Asia remains unclear. There may have been both an "interior route" and a "coastal route", correlating in part with the distribution and frequency of paternal haplogroup subclades. Accordingly, ancient and modern East Asians can be modeled as admixture between both a deeply branching interior lineage (represented by the Tianyuan specimen) and an equally deep branching coastal lineage (represented by present-day Önge peoples). The amounts of interior and coastal contributions vary depending on each model; while one study estimated 90% interior + 10% coastal contributions, others estimated between 21–26% interior + 74–79% coastal contributions, or nearly equal amounts of interior and coastal contributions (51–56% and 44–49% respectively). There are also alternative scenarios for the divergence patterns of ancient East Asians without a distinct interior–coastal dispersal. Wang et al. 2025 found further evidence for that ancient and present-day East Asians formed as admixture between two basal Asian sources, specifically between a lineage represented by the Xingyi_EN specimen, and a lineage represented by the Tianyuan specimen.
There is also genetic evidence for migrations to Northern Asia and Siberia from both a deeply diverged East Eurasian Initial Upper Paleolithic group (related to the Ust'-Ishim man and or the Bacho Kiro cave remains) via Central Asia, which may have contributed ancestry (up to 39%) to the Tianyuan lineage (with the remainder 61% being from an Onge-like source), and from a later Upper Paleolithic West Eurasian-affiliated source, which contributed to the formation of Ancient North Eurasians (ANE/ANS). While the southern migration wave likely diversified after settling within East Asia, the wave associated with Upper Paleolithic Europeans mixed with the southern wave somewhere in Siberia. The ANE derive around 2/3 (50–71%) of their ancestry from a West Eurasian-like source best represented by Upper Paleolithic Europeans, and around 1/3 (29–50%) from an East Eurasian source best represented by the Tianyuan man or Upper Paleolithic East/Southeast Asians. The legacy of this Paleolithic admixture event is also evident by the later dispersal of haplogroups Q and R, as well as ANE-like ancestry throughout Northern Eurasia, but which had only limited influence on modern East Asian groups. "In the study of Zhong et al. haplogroups O-M175, C-M130, D-M174 and N-M231 still suggests the substantial contribution of the southern route. However, the Central Asia and West Eurasia related haplogroups, such as haplogroups R-M207 and Q-M242, occur primarily in northwestern East Asia and their frequencies gradually decrease from west to east. In addition, the Y-STR diversities of haplogroups R-M207 and Q-M242 also indicate the existence of northern route migration about 18,000 years ago from Central Asia to North Asia, and recent population admixture along the Silk Road since about 3000 years ago (Piazza 1998)." "In addition to the earliest southern settlement of AMHs in East Asia, ancient migration (40–18 kya) into East Asia via the "Northern Route" from West Eurasia was previously proposed. The "Northern Route" hypothesis would also explain where the subtle shared ancient north Eurasian (ANE) ancestry came from that is then also shared with Native Americans." However, there is significant genetic input from North Eurasian hunter-gatherers, who lived about 10–4 kya and are characterized by distinct West and East Eurasian admixture, into ancient and present Uralic and Yeniseian-speaking populations. Uralic-speaking populations were also responsible for spreading haplogroup N throughout Eurasia. For Turkic, Mongolic and Tungusic-speaking populations and Late Bronze and Iron Age pastoralists such as Scythians, Sarmatians and Xiongnu, there is limited input from these hunter-gatherers. Other studies also detect notable ANE input in ancient northern Chinese populations via Ancient Paleo-Siberian-related populations.
Although Huang et al. (2021) found evidence for light skin being selected among the ancestral populations of West Eurasians and East Eurasians, prior to their divergence, the main period for the selection of light skin alleles (such as rs1800414-G) started around 25,000 to 30,000 years ago in East Asia, after the northwards expansion from South Asia. The affiliated alleles are distinct from those observed among European/Middle Eastern populations.
In contrast to the demographic history of Europe, which was shaped by multiple geneflow events from the Middle East and Central Asia, the demographic history of Eastern Asia is characterized by genetic continuity of multiple inter-related Basal Asian lineages and only negligible influence from non-Asian lineages.
Diversification and substructure After the peopling of the South and Southeast Asia region by the East Eurasian Core (EEC), this ancestral population diverged rapidly into at least three "deeply branching East Asian lineages, namely the "Ancient Ancestral South Indians" (AASI) staying in Southern Asia, Australasians (AA) heading into Oceania, and the East and Southeast Asian (ESEA) branch in Southeast Asia and subsequently expanding northwards. The ESEA branch would become broadly ancestral to modern East Asians, Southeast Asians, Polynesians, Siberians, and Native Americans. The ESEA source population is estimated to have expanded outgoing from Mainland Southeast Asia at c. 40,000 BCE. The deepest split among the ESEA lineage gave rise to the "Basal Asian" Hoabinhian hunter-gatherers of Southeast Asia, the Xingyi lineage in Southern China, and the c. 39,000-year-old Tianyuan lineage in Northern China and the Amur Region. This was followed by the divergence of the Jōmon lineage on the Japanese archipelago some 22,000 to 25,000 years ago. Then, finally the splitting of the Central Yunnan, Ancient Southern East Asians (ASEA), and Ancient Northern East Asians (ANEA) ancestries somewhere in East Asia over 19,000 years ago. ANEA ancestry replaced the earlier Tianyuan-like ancestry in Northern China, the Amur region, and parts of Siberia by at least 19,000 years ago. ASEA ancestry admixed with Xingyi ancestry to form the Longlin lineage at least 11,000 years ago, before ASEA ancestry replaced Longlin ancestry around 6,000 years ago in Southern China.
There are currently seven identified sub-ancestries on the ESEA branch: