Opinion 2/13 (2014) is an EU law case determined by the European Court of Justice, concerning the accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights, and more generally the relationship between the European Court of Justice and European Court of Human Rights.
Facts
In 2014, the European Commission asked the full court of the ECJ whether, in its view, the 2013 Draft Agreement between the European Union and the Council of Europe on accession of the EU to the European Convention on Human Rights was compatible with the Treaties.
Opinion of the Court The Court of Justice held that the EU could not accede to the ECHR under the Draft Agreement. It held the Agreement was incompatible with TEU article 6(2). Its reasons suggested the Draft Agreement (a) undermined the Court of Justice's autonomy; (b) allowed for a second dispute resolution mechanism among member states, against the treaties; (c) the "co-respondent" system, which allowed the EU and a member state to be sued together, allowed the ECtHR to illegitimately interpret EU law and allocate responsibility between the EU and member states;at 215–235 (d) did not allow the Court of Justice to decide if an issue of law was already dealt with, before the ECtHR heard a case;at 236–248 and (e) the ECtHR was illegitimately being given power of judicial review over the Common Foreign and Security Policy.at 249–257
See also
European Union law
Notes
References , in Diritto pubblico europeo rassegna online, febbraio 2017 * Graham Butler, The Ultimate Stumbling Block? The Common Foreign and Security Policy, and Accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights, in Dublin University Law Journal, 2017
External links Opinion 2/13: Accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms