Zaza and Gorani are two languages belonging to the Northwestern Iranian branch of the Iranian languages.Joyce Blau (1989), « Gûranî et zâzâ » in R. Schmitt (ed.), Compendium Linguarum Iranicarum, Wiesbaden, Reichert, p. 336. The archaic linguistic features of the two languages have led some researchers to propose that they form a Zaza-Gorani subgroup.
Classification The proposed Zaza–Gorani languages are the Zaza languages and the Gorani dialects. The Zaza language is defined as a macrolanguage consisting of two distinct individual languages; Southern Zaza and Northern Zaza, which are distinguished primarily by their phonological differences and spoken in various regions of Turkey. The Gorani dialects, on the other hand, consist of Shabaki, Hawrami, Bajelani, Kakayi and Sarli, spoken in small pockets in Iran and Iraq. Both the Zaza languages and the Gorani dialects are classified as Northwestern Iranian languages in their own right by international linguistic authorities and many other linguists and Iranologists.Gippert, Jost (2008). "Zur dialektalen Stellung des Zazaki". Die Sprache. 47 (1): 103.Lecoq, P. (1989) Le classement des langues irano-aryennes occidentales, in: C.-H. de Fouchecour I Pb. Gignoux (Hg.), Etudes irano-aryennes offertes a Gilbert Lazard, Paris pp. 247-264.
Speakers The Zaza language is the ancestral language of Zazas and the Zaza people are traditionally considered to be descendants of the Daylamites,:"The emergence of the Zazas on the present inhabited territories is connected with the waves of migrations from Daylam, the highlands of Gilan, during the 10-12 centuries which is reflected in their ethnonym - Dim(i)Iī. The theory of the Caspian origin of the Zazas is substantiated both linguistically (the Zaza language is a North-West Iranian dialect close to Talishi, Azari, Gilyaki, etc.) and historically (there are authentic historical data about the migration of the Daylamits to Central Anatolia)."
Andranik, (1900). Tersim (Dersim), Tblisi p. 161. a medieval martial society indigenous to Northern Iran who progressively expanded their presence into Anatolia during the medieval period.:"The emergence of the Zazas on the present inhabited territories is connected with the waves of migrations from Daylam, the highlands of Gilan, during the 10-12 centuries which is reflected in their ethnonym - Dim(i)Iī. The theory of the Caspian origin of the Zazas is substantiated both linguistically (the Zaza language is a North-West Iranian dialect close to Talishi, Azari, Gilyaki, etc.) and historically (there are authentic historical data about the migration of the Daylamits to Central Anatolia)." The Gorani dialects, on the other hand, are spoken by Gorans (Shabaks, Bajalans) and it is hypothesized within historical linguistics that the Gorani-speaking communities underwent a collective displacement from the Caspian basin to their current geographic localities during an undocumented period of early history. According to some, most of their speakers consider themselves ethnic Kurds. However, many Zazas and Gorans oppose it and emphasize their own separate identity distinct from the Kurds.
Criticism Despite the some similarities, there are significant linguistic differences between the Zaza and Gurani languages. Due to these differences, there is no generally accepted view that the Zaza and Gurani languages together form a Zaza-Gorani group on their own in contrast to other Northwestern language groups. The significant linguistic differences between the Zaza and Gorani languages were first noted by Karl Hadank, the first linguist to linguistically study and analyze the Zaza language. Hadank, in the Zâzâ und Gûrânî section of his prominent work, Mundarten der Zâzâ, demonstrated significant linguistic differences between Zaza and Gorani, including important phonological differences, differences and deviations in tense structures, conjugation systems and verbal particles and in glossaries and gender, the very clear gender declension in Zaza, including verb conjugations in contrast to the almost complete absence of gender in Gurani, in prefixs and suffixs, the absence of determinative suffixes in Zaza in contrast to Gorani's explicit use of them, Gorani's characteristic prepositions that Zazaca does not possess.Hadank, Karl (1932). Mundarten der Zâzâ, Hauptsächlich aus Siwerek und Kor (in German). Walter de Gruyter. pp. 24-26. Linguistic features that are assumed to unite Zaza and Gorani are also found in languages and dialects such as Semnani, Tati, Balochi, Talysh and Gilaki. Zaza, shows obvious parallels to Caspian languages (Iranian languages of the Caspian region) that Gurani lacks. Therefore, it has been noted multiple times that there is quite insufficient evidence to substantiate the Zaza-Gorani subgroup, as is often assumed, existing similarities do not imply that Zaza and Gorani ever formed a historical unit and no unifying characteristics have been found from Zaza and the Gorani group to demonstrate that they constitute a group on their own in contrast to other Northwestern language groups.Haig, G., & Öpengin, E. (2024). Introduction to Special Issue Kurdish: A critical research overview. Kurdish Studies Archive, 107-110.
Sources
Bibliography
(About Daylamite origin of Zazas and Guranis)
External links www.zazaki.net (Kırmancki, Zaza, Kirdki, Dimli) www.zazaki.de
Gallery