Century of humiliation

The century of humiliation () is a Chinese historiographical concept for a period in history beginning with the end of the First Opium War (1839–1842), and terminating with the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949 under the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The century-long period is typified by the decline, defeat and political fragmentation of the Qing dynasty and the subsequent Republic of China, which led to demoralizing foreign intervention, annexation and subjugation of China by Western powers, Russia, and Japan.

The characterization of the period as a "humiliation" arose with an atmosphere of Chinese nationalism following China's defeat in the First Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895 and the subsequent events including the scramble for concessions in the late 1890s. Since then the idea of national humiliation became a focus of discussions among many Chinese writers and scholars, although they differed somewhat in their understandings of national humiliation; ordinary scholars and constitutionalists also had different understanding of their home country from the anti-Qing revolutionaries in the late Qing period. The idea of national humiliation was also mentioned in late Qing textbooks.

Both the Kuomintang and Chinese Communist Party popularized the characterization in the 1920s, protesting the unequal treaties and loss of Chinese territory to foreign empires. During the 1930s and 1940s, the term became common due to the Japanese invasion of China proper. In 1943, the major western Allied nations of World War II, at the direction of the United States, agreed to revoke all unequal treaties they signed with the Qing government, officially ending the Treaty System along with foreign extraterritoriality, political and trade privileges, making foreign nationals subject to Chinese laws. Although formal treaty provisions were ended, the epoch remains central to concepts of Chinese nationalism, and the term is widely used in both political rhetoric and popular culture.

Foreign imperialism

Domestic conflicts

Taiping Rebellion

Xinhai Revolution

Warlord Era

Chinese Civil War

Failed reforms Self-Strengthening Movement

Hundred Days' Reform

New Policies

New Life Movement

Legacy

The usage of the Century of Humiliation in the Chinese Communist Party's historiography and modern Chinese nationalism, with its focus on the "sovereignty and integrity of [Chinese] territory," has been invoked in incidents such as the US bombing of the Chinese Belgrade embassy, the Hainan Island incident, and in response to protests for Tibetan independence along the 2008 Beijing Olympics torch relay. Some analysts have pointed to its use in deflecting foreign criticism of human rights abuses in China and domestic attention from issues of corruption and in bolstering its territorial claims and general economic and political rise.

Under Xi Jinping

Under Xi Jinping, the "Century of Humiliation" has become a central theme in the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) historical narrative and political messaging. While earlier leaders also referenced the concept to frame China's modern history, Xi has further institutionalized it as a foundational component of national identity and policy discourse. In speeches, CCP documents, and state media, the narrative is used to highlight China's vulnerability during the period of foreign imperialism and to present the CCP as the force that ended national subjugation by outside powers. Xi frequently ties this historical memory to the broader goal of achieving the "great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation," a central slogan of his administration.

The theme has become especially prominent in Xi-era patriotic education initiatives. China's 2023 Patriotic Education Law mandated the promotion of the CCP's historical narrative, identifying the Century of Humiliation as a major instructional theme, required for school curricula, museums, public memorials, online platforms, and cultural industries. The law aims to reinforce loyalty to the CCP by contrasting China's historical weakness with its contemporary rise. Scholars note that under Xi, "patriotic education" has broadened in scope and consistency, with the Century of Humiliation serving to reinforce political legitimacy and promote vigilance against perceived external threats.

In foreign policy, references to the Century of Humiliation frequently appear in discussions of China's territorial claims and diplomatic posture. Chinese leaders and official publications often portray disputes in the South China Sea, the East China Sea, and the Sino-Indian border as issues tied to unresolved historical injustices. This framing appears in CCP speeches, government white papers, and state-run media. Resolving these "historical problems" is often depicted as essential to completing national rejuvenation. The narrative is also applied to Taiwan, with officials framing Chinese unification as part of the same historical process of overcoming national fragmentation and foreign interference.

In China's relationship with the United States, the Century of Humiliation is frequently invoked in the context of trade and economic competition. Chinese officials and state media often portray U.S. tariffs, export controls, investment screens, and supply-chain restructuring as modern forms of pressure analogous to the unequal treaties imposed on China during the nineteenth century. This narrative emphasizes that just as foreign powers once used their economic advantages to weaken China, present-day U.S. policies are interpreted as attempts to constrain China's technological development. The same framing often appears in official publications concerning Taiwan as well.

Commentary and criticism

Historians have judged the Qing dynasty's vulnerability and weakness to foreign imperialism in the 19th century to be based mainly on its maritime naval weakness, but it achieved military success against Westerners on land. The historian Edward L. Dreyer stated, "China's nineteenth-century humiliations were strongly related to her weakness and failure at sea. At the start of the First Opium War, China had no unified navy and not a sense of how vulnerable she was to attack from the sea. British navy forces sailed and steamed wherever they wanted to go. In the Second Opium War (1856–1860), the Chinese had no way to prevent the Anglo-French navy expedition of 1860 from sailing into the Gulf of Zhili and landing as near as possible to Beijing. Meanwhile, new but not exactly modern Chinese armies suppressed the midcentury rebellions, bluffed Russia into a peaceful settlement of disputed frontiers in Central Asia, and defeated the French forces on land in the Sino-French War (1884–85). But the defeat at sea, and the resulting threat to steamship traffic to Taiwan, forced China to conclude peace on unfavorable terms."

The historian Jane E. Elliott criticized the allegation that China refused to modernize or was unable to defeat Western armies as simplistic by noting that China embarked on a massive military modernization in the late 1800s after several defeats, bought weapons from Western countries, and manufactured its own at arsenals, such as the Hanyang Arsenal during the Boxer Rebellion. In addition, Elliott questioned the claim that Chinese society was traumatized by the Western victories, as many Chinese peasants (then 90% of the population) lived outside the concessions and continued about their daily lives uninterrupted and without any feeling of "humiliation".

Century of humiliation

Bron en licentie