These are regular season standings and playoff results for the NBA G League. The NBA G League is the official minor league basketball organization owned and run by the National Basketball Association (NBA). The league was formed in 2001 as the National Basketball Development League (NBDL). The league was renamed to NBA Development League (NBA D-League) in 2005 to reflect its close affiliation with the NBA. In 2017, it was renamed NBA G League, as part of a sponsorship deal with Gatorade.
2001–02
Team W L Win % GB North Charleston Lowgators 36 20 .643 — Greenville Groove 36 20 .643 — Columbus Riverdragons 31 25 .554 5 Mobile Revelers 30 26 .536 6 Huntsville Flight 26 30 .464 10 Asheville Altitude 26 30 .464 10 Fayetteville Patriots 21 35 .375 15 Roanoke Dazzle 18 38 .321 18
Finals April 8: Greenville 81, North Charleston 63 April 10: Greenville 76, North Charleston 68
Finals
2002–03
Team W L Win % GB Fayetteville Patriots 32 18 .640 — North Charleston Lowgators 26 24 .520 6 Mobile Revelers 26 24 .520 6 Roanoke Dazzle 26 24 .520 6 Asheville Altitude 23 27 .460 9 Columbus Riverdragons 23 27 .460 9 Greenville Groove 22 28 .440 10 Huntsville Flight 22 28 .440 10
Finals April 4: Mobile 92, Fayetteville 82 April 9: Fayetteville 77, Mobile 71 April 11: Mobile 75, Fayetteville 72
Finals
2003–04 Team W L Win % GB Asheville Altitude 28 18 .609 — Charleston Lowgators 27 19 .587 1 Huntsville Flight 24 22 .522 4 Fayetteville Patriots 21 25 .457 7 Roanoke Dazzle 20 26 .435 8 Columbus Riverdragons 18 28 .391 10
Finals boxscore
2004–05 Team W L Win % GB Columbus Riverdragons 30 18 .625 — Asheville Altitude 27 21 .563 3 Huntsville Flight 27 21 .563 3 Roanoke Dazzle 26 22 .542 4 Fayetteville Patriots 17 31 .354 13 Florida Flame 17 31 .354 13
Finals boxscore
2005–06 Team W L Win % GB Fort Worth Flyers 28 20 .583 — Albuquerque Thunderbirds 26 22 .542 2 Florida Flame 25 23 .521 3 Roanoke Dazzle 25 23 .521 3 Arkansas RimRockers 24 24 .500 4 Austin Toros 24 24 .500 4 Tulsa 66ers 24 24 .500 4 Fayetteville Patriots 16 32 .333 12
Finals boxscore
2006–07
Regular season
Eastern Division Team x-Dakota Wizards (1) 33 17 – 19–6 14–11 x-Sioux Falls Skyforce (2) 30 20 3 17–8 13–12 x-Fort Worth Flyers (3) 29 21 4 18–7 11–14 Tulsa 66ers 21 29 12 12–13 9–14 Austin Toros 21 29 12 11–14 10–15 Arkansas RimRockers 16 34 17 11–14 5–20
Western Division Team x-Idaho Stampede (1) 33 17 – 16–9 17–8 x-Colorado 14ers (2) 28 22 5 16–9 12–13 x-Albuquerque Thunderbirds (3) 24 26 9 14–11 10–15 Los Angeles D-Fenders 23 27 10 13–12 10–15 Anaheim Arsenal 23 27 10 11–14 12–13 Bakersfield Jam 19 31 14 12–13 7–18
Notes x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.
Playoffs Three teams with the best regular season records in each division qualified for playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with single elimination format. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in the first and second rounds, while teams with higher seed holds home-court advantage in the Finals. The division winners received a bye from the first round. The remaining teams faced each other in the first round.
Notes The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding. An asterisk (*) denotes overtime period(s). Teams in bold advanced to the next round. Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.
Finals
2007–08
Regular season
Central Division Team x-Dakota Wizards (3) 29 21 – 18–7 11–14 x-Sioux Falls Skyforce (6) 28 22 1 19–6 9–16 Iowa Energy 22 28 7 13–12 9–16 Fort Wayne Mad Ants 17 33 12 12–13 5–20
Southwest Division Team x-Austin Toros (2) 30 20 – 19–6 11–14 x-Colorado 14ers (5) 29 21 1 17–8 12–13 Tulsa 66ers 26 24 4 14–11 12–13 Albuquerque Thunderbirds 22 28 8 14–11 8–17 Rio Grande Valley Vipers 21 29 9 16–9 5–20
Western Division Team x-Idaho Stampede (1) 36 14 – 21–4 15–10 x-Los Angeles D-Fenders (4) 32 18 4 19–6 13–12 Utah Flash 24 26 12 14–11 10–15 Anaheim Arsenal 23 27 13 14–11 9–16 Bakersfield Jam 11 39 25 9–16 2–23 Notes x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.
Playoffs The three division winners, along with the next three teams with the best regular season records regardless of division, qualified for the playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with single elimination format for the first two rounds and best-of-three format for the finals. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in every rounds. The three division winners were seeded from 1 to 3 based on their regular season records, while the remaining teams were seeded from 4 to 6 based on their regular season records. The two division winners with the best regular season records received a bye from the first round. The remaining division winners faced the lowest seeded teams, while the two remaining teams faced each other.
Notes The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding. The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round. The division winners are marked by an asterisk (*). Teams in bold advanced to the next round. Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.
Finals
2008–09
Regular season Complete rosters for each of the 16 2008–09 NBA D-League teams will consist of the ten players drafted November 7 along with seven returning, allocation, and local tryout players. Rosters will be reduced to 12 players on November 20 and opening-day 10-man rosters must be set by November 26 in anticipation of the November 28 tip off of the NBA D-League's eighth season. Each team will play one preseason game between November 19 and 25.
Central Division Team x-Iowa Energy (3) 28 22 – 17–8 11–14 x-Dakota Wizards (6) 27 23 1 16–9 11–14 x-Erie BayHawks (7) 27 23 1 16–9 11–14 Sioux Falls Skyforce 25 25 3 13–12 12–13 Fort Wayne Mad Ants 19 31 9 11–14 8–17
Southwest Division Team x-Colorado 14ers (1) 34 16 – 20–5 14–11 x-Austin Toros (4) 32 18 2 17–8 15–10 Albuquerque Thunderbirds 24 26 10 15–10 9–16 Rio Grande Valley Vipers 21 29 13 12–13 9–16 Tulsa 66ers 15 35 19 8–17 7–18
Western Division Team x-Utah Flash (2) 32 18 – 17–8 15–10 x-Idaho Stampede (5) 31 19 1 20–5 11–14 x-Bakersfield Jam (8) 26 24 6 16–9 10–15 Reno Bighorns 25 25 7 18–7 7–18 Los Angeles D-Fenders 19 31 13 11–14 8–17 Anaheim Arsenal 15 35 17 9–16 6–19 Notes x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.
Playoffs The three division winners, along with the next five teams with the best regular season records regardless of division, qualified for the playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with single elimination format for the first two rounds and best-of-three format for the finals. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in every rounds. The three division winners were seeded from 1 to 3 based on their regular season records, while the remaining teams were seeded from 4 to 8 based on their regular season records. The three division winners had to choose their opponents in the first round from among the four lowest seeded teams. The fourth seeded team would be paired with the remaining team that is not chosen as an opponent by the three division winners. For the first time in the best-of-three era, a team completed a perfect postseason record, with the 14ers going a perfect 4–0 to win the championship.
Notes The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding. The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round. The division winners are marked by an asterisk (*). Teams in bold advanced to the next round. Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.
Finals
2009–10
Regular season
Eastern Conference Team x-Iowa Energy (1) 37 13 – 19–6 18–7 x-Sioux Falls Skyforce (4) 32 18 5 20–5 12–13 x-Dakota Wizards (5) 29 21 8 21–4 8–17 Maine Red Claws 27 23 10 16–9 11–14 Fort Wayne Mad Ants 22 28 15 13–12 9–16 Erie BayHawks 21 29 16 10–15 11–14 Springfield Armor 7 43 30 7–18 0–25
Western Conference Team x-Rio Grande Valley Vipers (2) 34 16 – 21–4 13–12 x-Austin Toros (3) 32 18 2 18–7 14–11 x-Reno Bighorns (6) 28 22 6 15–10 13–12 x-Utah Flash (7) 28 22 6 14–11 14–11 x-Tulsa 66ers (8) 26 24 8 15–10 10–15 Idaho Stampede 25 25 9 15–10 11–14 Albuquerque Thunderbirds 18 32 16 13–12 5–20 Bakersfield Jam 17 33 17 10–15 7–18 Los Angeles D-Fenders 16 34 18 9–16 7–18
Notes x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.
Playoffs The Eastern and Western Conference winners, along with the next six teams with the best regular season records regardless of conference, qualified for the playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with best-of-three format. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in every rounds. The teams were seeded from 1 to 8 based on their regular season records. The top three seeds had to choose their opponents in the first round from among the four lowest seeded teams. The fourth seeded team would be paired with the remaining team that is not chosen as an opponent by the top three seeds.
This was the first Finals to feature teams with a single affiliation partnership, which featured the Rio Grande Valley Vipers (operated by the Houston Rockets) and the Tulsa 66ers (operated by the Oklahoma City Thunder). The Vipers won Game 1 and then finished Game 2 with a last-second shot by Craig Winder to win their first championship.
Notes The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding. The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round. The conference champions are marked by an asterisk (*). Teams in bold advanced to the next round. Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.
Finals
2010–11
Regular season
Eastern Conference Team x-Iowa Energy (1) 37 13 – 21–4 16–9 x-Erie BayHawks (5) 32 18 5 18–7 14–11 Fort Wayne Mad Ants 24 26 13 16–9 8–17 Dakota Wizards 19 31 18 11–14 8–17 Maine Red Claws 18 32 19 14–11 4–21 Springfield Armor 13 37 24 7–18 6–19 Sioux Falls Skyforce 10 40 27 6–19 4–21
Western Conference Team x-Reno Bighorns (2) 34 16 – 20–5 14–11 x-Rio Grande Valley Vipers (3) 33 17 1 17–8 16–9 x-Tulsa 66ers (4) 33 17 1 17–8 16–9 x-Bakersfield Jam (6) 29 21 5 17–8 12–13 x-Utah Flash (7) 28 22 6 16–9 12–13 x-Texas Legends (8) 24 26 10 15–10 9–16 Idaho Stampede 24 26 10 12–13 12–13 Austin Toros 22 28 12 13–12 9–16 New Mexico Thunderbirds 20 30 14 13–12 7–18
Notes x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.
Playoffs The Eastern and Western Conference winners, along with the next six teams with the best regular season records regardless of conference, qualified for the playoffs. The playoffs consist of three rounds with best-of-three format. Teams with the better regular season record holds home-court advantage in every rounds. The teams were seeded from 1 to 8 based on their regular season records. The top three seeds had to choose their opponents in the first round from among the four lowest seeded teams. The fourth seeded team would be paired with the remaining team that is not chosen as an opponent by the top three seeds.
Notes The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding. The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round. The conference champions are marked by an asterisk (*). Teams in bold advanced to the next round. Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.
Finals
2011–12
Regular season
Eastern Conference